Please keep in mind that the book I'm editing for Flex is a Dungeons & Dragons supplement. It's not a scholarly text like G's. In so saying, are you annoyed by some minor things like:
- overuse of "but" as a sentence opener?
- the occasional dangling modifier?
- quirky wording?
- sections of choppy, short sentences?
- sentences ending in prepositions?
I feel compelled to make everything perfect, yet it will change Flex's style of writing to do so. There is nothing glaringly offensive, yet there could be a lot done to polish his style. If I did so, it would result in a lot of small corrections that might modify his voice and his cadence. I really hesitate to do so, for he has a unique way of expressing himself.
If I change half to two thirds of these, is that enough? For something as light as a gaming manual, would you be offended?
- overuse of "but" as a sentence opener?
- the occasional dangling modifier?
- quirky wording?
- sections of choppy, short sentences?
- sentences ending in prepositions?
I feel compelled to make everything perfect, yet it will change Flex's style of writing to do so. There is nothing glaringly offensive, yet there could be a lot done to polish his style. If I did so, it would result in a lot of small corrections that might modify his voice and his cadence. I really hesitate to do so, for he has a unique way of expressing himself.
If I change half to two thirds of these, is that enough? For something as light as a gaming manual, would you be offended?
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Listen to his voice in your head and write it from his point of view.
From:
no subject
If it's not for publication, then it can be more loose.
From:
no subject
For a gaming guide (intended for an audience whose members can range in age and reading ability so widely) the 3rd and 4th might be to Flex's advantage (so long as the short sentences are clear). And the necessity of correcting the fifth is somewhat controversial these days.
From:
no subject
The other part is tha tthe corrections may improve sales.
When I look at buying a D&D book, I pick it up and skim read a few paragraphs. Poor use of language generally suggest poor editing, poor writing, and as a result leave me assuming poor production values. Given the cost of D&D books, I will almost invariably turn to a different book if I find one like that.
From:
no subject
A gaming manual may be 'light', but it's also trying to get across information that the readers are intended to use. Grammar exists in the service of clarity of communication. In the end, it's his choice whether to use any given correction, so I say correct everything. It isn't as though you weren't asked to.*
* Ha, I didn't add 'do so' to the end of that and I feel FINE. ;)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
yes
yes
no
it depends
"that is something up with which I will not put." Again, it depends. :P
I'm a tech writer. I'm annoyed by poor grammar, but what I write often requires short sentences. I get annoyed to the point where I won't read something badly written unless I must. If he's planning on sending it off for publication, an editor will either want it rewritten to be grammatically correct, or it won't get past the slush pile because it's not. Voice is important, but really, it needs to be a well-written voice.
From:
no subject
It's a conjunction! School House Rock said so!! :~(